In a brand new assertion, the Friedrich Schiller College Jena expressly condemned the assault on Constantin Schreiber with a cake. The college due to this fact has the “Tagesschau” speaker invited to talk with representatives about assaults on journalists and the tradition of dialogue, as “Spiegel” first reported. Schreiber advised “Spiegel” that he was completely satisfied to just accept this invitation.
Schreiber is at a studying on the College of Jena on August twenty ninth been attacked with a cake. The information anchor and writer then introduced in an interview with “Zeit” that he not wished to touch upon “something that has even the remotest reference to Islam,” as Schreiber advised “Zeit”. “I received’t write any books about it, I flip down speak present requests, I received’t do it anymore.”
The college has cost in opposition to particular person unknown and Constantin Schreiber assured her full solidarity, the assertion says. The college and the Thaila bookstore, which collectively organized the studying, had anticipated a crucial debate. However the assault was “stunning” and “unforeseeable”.
Accordingly, a consultant of the bookstore and a consultant of the college met after the occasion Apologies to the author. The College of Jena sees itself as a “place of open discourse the place totally different positions are mentioned with arguments,” the assertion continues.
Authorities condemns threats and intimidation
After Schreiber’s announcement, high-ranking representatives of the federal authorities and the visitors mild coalition criticized the state of public discourse on the subject of Islam in Germany.
Federal Minister of the Inside Nancy Faeser (SPD) advised the “Bild” newspaper on Friday: “When individuals withdraw from public debate due to intimidation and threats, then that’s at all times a nasty signal – particularly if you don’t share the opposite’s opinion.” Within the occasion of intimidation and violence, the rule of regulation can be required. No person must be allowed to get their method with this.
We must always talk about issues extra objectively with one another, particularly in terms of the matters of migration, integration and faith. We now have to cease placing individuals in bins and stigmatizing them.
Reem Alabali-RadovanIntegration Commissioner of the Federal Authorities (SPD)
The Integration Commissioner of the Federal Authorities, Minister of State Reem Alabali-Radovan (SPD)warned one Objectification of public dialogue with reference to faith to: “Particularly in terms of the matters of migration, integration and faith, we must always talk about issues extra objectively with one another. We now have to cease placing individuals in bins and stigmatizing them. This additionally means permitting different opinions and controversies and never stirring up resentment.” One shouldn’t permit agitation, hostility and threats.
Bundestag Vice President Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) he added I observe a elementary drawback in Germany in conducting crucial discussions with reference to Islam. Schreiber has nothing to do with right-wing extremism: “But when there’s a public local weather wherein his thought of criticism is answered with verbal and bodily assaults, we now have a democracy drawback.”
Schreiber’s choice displays “a long-term improvement that may be threatening to our democracy,” added Kubicki: “Anybody who, after this course of, nonetheless claims that cancel tradition doesn’t exist in Germany should be accused of knowingly or intentionally distorting the democratic discourse to destroy unconsciously.”
Schreiber’s books and TV reviews sit down partly critically examines sermons and instructing supplies in mosques and Koranic faculties. Nonetheless, he emphasizes that he has not written something crucial of Islam, anti-Islam or anti-Muslim.
The journalist was at one on August twenty ninth Look on the College of Jena by left-wing activists with a cake pressed into their faces been. Schreiber emphasised that he seen the cake throwing as a infantile act. Nonetheless, he was rather more involved that the organizers of the studying didn’t straight shield him and specific solidarity with him, however as an alternative emphasised that the opinions of those individuals shouldn’t be excluded. (with KNA)